The class lecture dealt with state functionality and
how the protection of rights provided to the citizens has to be subject to
reasonable restrictions. While the state derives its legitimacy from the
consent of individuals, it’s this very heterogeneity prevents the existence of
absolute rights for speech. Talking about free speech and it’s implied
connotations for the media, Mr. Satyaprakash discussed how the state is a
self-preserving entity, and therefore promulgates laws that seek to dissuade
dissent. While reasonable restrictions are imposed on free speech, the metric
to gauge whether the imposed restriction is reasonable or not is the ‘direct
impact’ method. Simply stated, this method ascertains whether the restriction
imposed completely hinders the very right it has presupposed to exist.
Showing posts with label Media Laws and Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media Laws and Ethics. Show all posts
August 30, 2013
August 16, 2013
The first lecture on media laws and ethics by Mr. Satyaprakash
focused on the basic duties of a reporting, during on-field reporting. In an elaborate
lecture, he said about the basic duties and rules to be followed by
reporters, that enables us to cover a complete story which makes sense and appeals to the
larger masses.
Of the many things that he explained, he said that the first
and foremost duty of a reporter includes informing the office or the editor
about the incident and seeking permission to go ahead for covering the story. On
getting a go ahead, there are several other factors that must be considered to
make the news worthwhile.
One of the first ones to follow is the 5W1H rule, which
entails covering ‘What the incident or the story is all about and where did it occur, when and why did it happen and whom all does it affect’ and how? This
ensures that the news being filed is complete in every sense and makes it to
the final print.
He continued with the lecture and talked at length about
setting an agenda for discussion and debate in the society. This however is
decided on the nature of reporting being done. For instance, only covering a
particular incident and its details falls under micro reporting. On the other
hand, covering the bigger picture related to the incident is macro reporting,
and this is what sets the tone for debates and discussions.
Journalism and journalists, more often than not, act as a
watchdog for the society. They report and cover the details pertaining to
events which go unnoticed. Investigative journalism is one such field, which
requires coming out with facts supported by proof, which otherwise would not
come to the knowledge of the common man. And for all this, it is very important
that to educate the common masses, one needs to research and research more to
mature as a journalist. And then we have the duty to entertain the masses, by
thinking and coming up with various ways in which the common man can be kept
engaged to a common social cause.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)