Prof. Satyaprakash continued from where
he left off in the previous class. He spoke about Parliamentary proceedings. He
brought forward the topic of Nehru- (Feroze) Gandhi tussle. He added that the
two most important amendments to Parliamentary Proceedings (Protection of
Publication) Act happened during and after the emergency. The two said
amendments are Amendment 22 and Amendment 44. He said that the 1956 Act was
revived by the Janata Party govt. in 1977 by adding article 361 (A).
He then spoke about one of the most
pertinent subjects as far as media professionals are concerned- Defamation. He
said every person has a Right to Reputation. And false and defamatory statement
against somebody without any lawful justification constitutes defamation.
Defamation by spoken words is called slander while Defamation by written words
is called libel. Under the Indian Penal Code, there can be civil and criminal
defamation.
He further spoke about technicality of
this law. Section 499 of the IPC deals with the criminal defamation while
section 500 deals with its punishment.
He raised some questions regarding what
kind of publication will constitute defamation. The stress was on the phrase
‘lawful justification’. If a newspaper publishes that a said person has
committed a crime based on the description by police, then even if the person
is acquitted by a court of law later, the person cannot sue the publication.
He gave the example of Justice Verma
commission and added that while criticism is fine, defamation is not.
No comments:
Post a Comment